Controversial ICC prosecutor to be replaced by British lawyer

The controversial body was designed to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, but devotes resources to pursuing Israel, instead of some of the world’s worst human rights abusers.

By World Israel News Staff and AP

More than 120 countries elected British lawyer Karim Khan on Friday as the next prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

The controversial body was designed to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, but devotes resources to pursuing Israel, instead of some of the world’s worst human rights abusers.

His election on the second secret ballot by the 123 parties to the Rome Statute that established the court ends a drawn-out and divisive process to replace Fatou Bensouda when her 9-year term expires in June.

Bensouda recently claimed the ICC has jurisdiction over the Palestinians’ allegations against Israel, a contention that flies in the face of a host of international law experts.

Khan, who has specialized in international criminal law and international human rights law, was widely seen as the favorite to get the job. But neither he nor any of the other candidates garnered enough support to be appointed by consensus, prompting Friday’s election in the U.N. General Assembly Hall.

When Michal Mlynár, vice-president of the court’s Assembly of State Parties, announced that Khan had won, a smattering of applause broke out in the hall, where masked diplomats had voted one by one, putting ballots into spaced out boxes because of COVID-19 restrictions.

Read  How the NY Times misreports the Gaza war

Khan received 72 votes, far more than the majority needed, Fergal Gaynor of Ireland was second with 42 votes followed by Spain’s Carlos Castresana Fernandez with 5 votes and Francesco Lo Voi of Italy with 3 votes. One member did not vote.

Khan currently leads a U.N. team set up to investigate allegations of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed by the Islamic State group in Iraq and has the rank of a U.N. assistant secretary-general. He has worked as a prosecutor at the tribunal prosecuting war crimes in former Yugoslavia and crimes against humanity and genocide in Rwanda.

Khan is no stranger to the International Criminal Court, known as the ICC, having acted as a defense lawyer for Kenyan Deputy President William Ruto and persuading judges to throw out prosecution charges against his client. Gaynor acted as a legal representative for victims in the Ruto case, which focused on post-election violence.

Khan also served as counsel for Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, the son of the late Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi, who is still being sought by the ICC on charges of crimes against humanity.

“Karim Khan’s election as prosecutor is occurring at a time when the ICC is needed more than ever but has faced significant challenges and pressure on its role,” said Richard Dicker, international justice director at Human Rights Watch. “We will be looking to Mr. Khan to address shortcomings in the court’s performance, while demonstrating firm independence in seeking to hold even the most powerful rights abusers to account.”

Read  AIPAC spent more than $14M to unseat Jamaal Bowman. Did it have to?

The Rome Statute which established the court was adopted on July 17, 1998 and it entered into force on July 1, 2002, with a mandate to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide — but it only steps in when domestic courts fail to initiate their own investigations and prosecutions. Its 123 state parties are bound by its provisions, which include arresting all those sought by the court.

While the Security Council has used its power under the Rome Statute to refer conflicts in Sudan’s western Darfur region and in Libya to the ICC, calls for the U.N.’s most powerful body to refer Syria, and more recently Myanmar, to the tribunal have failed.

Evidence points to the Syrian regime’s use of chemical weapons on its own people, in addition to a host of other atrocities perpetrated by the Bashar Assad’s forces.

In the last several years, Bensouda has sought to broaden its reach beyond its early all-African focus including Afghanistan and the Palestinians, despite the fact that the latter does not constitute a state under the pertinent definitions.

Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration slapped sanctions on Bensouda and one of her top aides last year.

Last week, ICC judges angered Israel by saying the court’s jurisdiction extends to Judea and Samaria, potentially clearing the way for the prosecutor to open an investigation into Israel’s construction of Jewish towns in those areas.

Read  Why are Hamas's crimes ignored by Western media?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the decision a “perversion of justice.”

Dicker said the ICC’s challenges include addressing some poor judicial decision-making and having a docket too large for its current staffing.”

The selection process for the prosecutor and the failure by the ICC’s Assembly of States Parties to conduct stringent background checks on the candidates to ensure they met the requirement of “high moral character” has drawn criticism from civil society groups that work with the court.

A diplomat who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss details of closed meetings said the fact that many of the
meetings to discuss possible successors to Bensouda took place virtually made it difficult for member nations to discuss concerns during informal “corridor” meetings.