Iran nuclear chief threatens Israel with ‘consequences’

“I hope they will not commit a similar mistake again because the consequences would be, I think, harsh,” Salehi warned Israel regarding its plans to sabotage the Iran nuclear program. 

By: AP and World Israel News Staff

Iran’s nuclear chief said Tuesday he hopes Tehran’s atomic deal with world powers will survive President Donald Trump withdrawing the US from it. He also threatened that the Islamic Republic’s program stands ready to build advanced centrifuges and further enrich uranium.

In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Ali Akbar Salehi stressed that Iran would be guided by “prudence and wisdom” when weighing whether to abandon the deal if European nations fail to protect it from Trump.

The US withdrawal from the deal already has badly shaken Iran’s anemic economy, crashing its currency, the rial. That likely will be compounded by US sanctions coming in November that threaten Iran’s oil exports, a major source of government funding.

Salehi dismissed out of hand the idea of caving to American demands to renegotiate the accord.

“Yes, we have our problems. Yes, the sanctions have caused some problems for us. But if a nation decides to enjoy political independence, it will have to pay the price,” Salehi said. “If Iran decided today to go back to what it was before, the lackey of the United States,” the situation would be different.

Read  Israel weighing sanctions on Palestinian leadership after UN vote

A string of bombings, blamed on Israel, targeted a number of scientists beginning in 2010 at the height of Western concerns over Iran’s program. Israel never claimed responsibility for the attacks, though Israeli officials have boasted in the past about the reach of the country’s intelligence services.

“I hope that they will not commit a similar mistake again because the consequences would be, I think, harsh,” Salehi warned.

Salehi heads the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, whose Tehran campus encompasses a nuclear research reactor given to the country by the US in 1967 under the rule of the shah. But in the time since that American “Atoms for Peace” donation, Iran was convulsed by its 1979 Islamic Revolution and the subsequent takeover and hostage crisis at the US Embassy in Tehran.

For decades since, Western nations have been concerned about Iran’s nuclear program, accusing Tehran of seeking atomic weapons. Iran long has claimed its program is for peaceful purposes.

Preparations to breach the deal

Salehi spoke to AP on Tuesday about Iran’s efforts to build a new facility at Natanz that would produce more-advanced centrifuges, which enrich uranium by rapidly spinning uranium hexafluoride gas.

The new facility would allow Iran to build versions called the IR-2M, IR-4 and IR-6. The IR-2M and the IR-4 can enrich uranium five times faster than an IR-1, while the IR-6 can do it 10 times faster, Salehi said. Western experts have suggested these centrifuges produce three to five times more enriched uranium in a year than the old IR-1 version.

Read  90 countries demand Israel lift PA sanctions, restore terror funding

While building the facility does not violate the nuclear deal, mass production of advanced centrifuges would. Salehi, however, said that was not an immediate plan.

“This does not mean that we are going to produce these centrifuges now. This is just a preparation,” he said. “In case Iran decides to start producing in mass production such centrifuges, (we) would be ready for that.”

Salehi suggested that if the nuclear deal fell apart, Iran would react in stages. One step may be uranium enrichment going to “20 percent, because this is our need.” He also suggested Iran could increase its stockpile of enriched uranium. Any withdrawal ultimately would be approved by Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Trump ‘is on the loser’s side’

Asked what he personally would tell Trump if he had the chance, Salehi chuckled and said, “I certainly would tell him he has made the wrong move on Iran.”

“I think (Trump) is on the loser’s side because he is pursuing the logic of power,” Salehi added. “He thinks that he can, you know, continue for some time, but certainly I do not think he will benefit from this withdrawal, certainly not.”

In the wake of Trump’s decision, however, Western companies from airplane manufacturers to oil firms have pulled out of Iran. The rial, which traded before the decision at 62,000 to $1, now stands at 142,000 to $1.

Read  Netanyahu strikes defiant tone on Iran nuclear deal, 'from position of strength'

Despite that, Salehi said Iran could withstand that economic pressure as well as restart uranium enrichment with far more sophisticated equipment.

“If we have to go back and withdraw from the nuclear deal, we certainly do not go back to where we were before,” Salehi said. “We will be standing on a much, much higher position.”

Still, danger could loom for the program. The Stuxnet computer virus, widely believed to be a joint US-Israeli creation, once disrupted thousands of Iranian centrifuges.