London theater slammed for ‘Romeo and Juliet’ with Nazi and Jewish girl

The director apologized for a casting call asking for non-binary, black, Asian actors, but not Jews. 

By Debbie Reiss, World Israel News

A London theater has come under fire over a production of Romeo and Juliet set in 1930s Germany in which the star-crossed lovers are a Nazi Youth member and a Jewish girl.

The Icarus Theatre Collective put out a casting call on Twitter on Friday and was met with backlash over the new take on the Shakespearean classic.

One person tweeted: “I wonder, did anyone in whatever meeting this was dreamt up in stop for one minute and think “Hmmm, Nazi boy and Jewish girl in a remake of Romeo and Juliet. Is this really a smart thing for us to be doing?'”

Another quipped: “This new Romeo and Juliet Nazi idea feels so genuinely like a 30 Rock episode that I simply have to laugh at the absurdity!”

While a third denounced the use of the Holocaust as “deeply misguided.”

“Romeo and Juliet as the story of impossible love in the Holocaust? Using the Holocaust as framing for “the most hopeful of love stories” dismisses every single bit of history of systematic murder and inhumanity,” the social media user wrote.

“Please rethink this crass and appalling idea,” another tweeted, and citing the opening line in the play, said, “‘Two households, both alike in dignity?'”

Read  Kamala’s Nazis

Both the theater and the play’s Jewish director, Max Lewendel, apologized for the wording of the original casting call, which failed to mention Jewish actors while calling for “non-binary artists, and/or those of Global Majority, black or Asian heritage” as part of the theater’s “ongoing efforts to ensure our on-stage team is representative of the wider UK population.”

Lewendel, who is also the founder and director of the Icarus Theatre Collective, told the UK-based Jewish Chronicle that the omission of Jews was a error by his casting director.

“It should have said on the Capulet characters a preference for people from the Jewish community. If that’s not there, that is a mistake,” he said.

“Oh s**t,” he said, while looking at the webpage. “I’m looking back on it now, and yes, that has been removed. That was in the first draft. I didn’t notice when it got removed.

“Apologies from us. Our first draft had it, we don’t know how it went wrong. We are correcting that as soon as possible. That is absolutely not what was intended, and apologies to anyone that was understandably affected by this.”

The first draft reads: “In defiance of their entire society and in secrecy from their closest friends, hopeful young lives burn amidst a cataclysmic backdrop of impending war. Sun and moon shine down on star-crossed lovers as a Jewish girl falls for a member of Nazi Youth and the boy questions everything he was taught to believe.

Read  Full-scale replica of Anne Frank’s annex to open in NYC

“They hide their passion and sexuality from their warring families and their closest friends. Misadventure, family pride, and antisemitism abort and bury the most joyous of beginnings, the most hopeful of love stories as Romeo and Juliet, driven apart, find their world becoming a constricting mausoleum of fate and death.”

‘Exploiting Jewish trauma’

However, Lewendel defended the play’s setting in the Nazi era, saying: “It’s the increasing fascism in the world today that has kind of become a trend in my work.

“I gained some comfort that the idea could be accepted when I saw things like ‘Jojo Rabbit‘, and it shows this young boy – younger than Romeo – who’s been indoctrinated but doesn’t really understand what he’s been indoctrinated against.”

Responding to his apology, the Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “We still struggle to think how this could be anything but tasteless.

“It is staggering that anyone would find this play about morally equivalent feuding families to be an appropriate way to explore Nuremberg-era persecution of Jews by Nazi Germany.”

Other social media users agreed, with one writing, “Would having Jewish actors actually help? It’s the concept that’s gross, not the representation!”

Another added: “This isn’t clever or subversive; it’s exploiting Jewish trauma in the most salacious way possible. Do better.”

Read  Dutch king: 'We failed the Jews again'

While a third wrote: “I really, really doubt most Jewish actors would want to do this. I mean, imagine having to pretend that one of the largest atrocities ever committed against your people was in any way ‘romantic’?? Yikes!!!”