The council president said Anne Bayefsky used “insulting and inflammatory” language.

By Batya Jerenberg, World Israel News

The UN Human Rights Council cut off a speaker who was denouncing UN officials by name for their antisemitism Friday, deeming her language “insulting and inflammatory.”

Anne Bayefsky, director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and Holocaust, was about two-thirds through her minute-and-a-half video statement to the council in Geneva when her feed was terminated.

Bayefsky had called out UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk for his “master class in unaccountability” accusing him of whitewashing a report on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and its top prosecutor, Karim Khan.

She referred to Khan as an “alleged serial rapist” due to several women’s complaints against him for serious sexual improprieties.

Khan went on administrative leave last May after an investigation was launched some seven months after the first complaint emerged, with no findings announced as yet.

She then criticized Türk for “providing material support” to three UN officials “who traffic in blatant antisemitism.”

She named UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese and the former chairs of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Navi Pillay and Chris Sidoti.

The commission has a unique open-ended mandate to investigate alleged Israeli violations of Palestinians’ human rights and identify alleged perpetrators. Its latest report, on the war in Gaza, was issued last September.

Both the U.S. and Israel have criticized it as heavily biased and antisemitic.

Bayefsky further alleged that the trio had “covered up Palestinian use of rape as a weapon of war,” referring to documented atrocities Hamas-led forces committed during their invasion of Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

At this point, Bayefsky’s image disappeared and U.N. Human Rights Council President Sidharto Suryodipuro interrupted the broadcast, stating that her comments amounted to “derogatory, insulting and inflammatory” personal attacks that were “unacceptable.”

While acknowledging that “everyone has a right to express their views,” Suryodipuro said statements must adhere to “the appropriate framework, terminology and decorum” of the United Nations.

In comments to Fox News Digital, Bayefsky said she was “the only American U.N.-accredited NGO with a speaking slot, and I wasn’t allowed even to conclude my 90 seconds of allotted time.”

“Free speech is non-existent at the U.N. so-called ‘Human Rights Council,'” said Bayefsky, a longtime defender of Israel at such events.

Other speakers at the session, who sharply criticized Israel, including accusations of genocide and ethnic cleansing, were permitted to complete their statements.

The post UN Human Rights Council cuts off speaker denouncing antisemitic officials appeared first on World Israel News.

Miloon Kothari also used a classic antisemitic trope, claiming that the “Jewish lobby” controls social media.

By Batya Jerenberg, World Israel News

A top UN official said Monday that Israel should be thrown out of the UN due to the way it treats both Israeli Arabs and Palestinians, in a report by anti-Israel media site Mondoweiss.

“I would go as far as to raise the question of why [Israel is] even a member of the United Nations, because… the Israeli government does not respect its own obligations as a UN member state,” said Miloon Kothari, one of three members of the Human Rights Council’s Commission of Inquiry on the ‘Occupied Palestinian Territory’ (OPT).

Charging that Israel “is in systematic violation” of “humanitarian law, human rights law, criminal law,” he said, “They, in fact, consistently, either directly or through the United States, try to undermine UN mechanisms.”

The Commission came out last month with its first report on the origin of the Middle East conflict, pointing to the “perpetual occupation” of the regions Israel liberated during 1967’s Six Day War as “the underlying root cause of recurrent tensions, instability and protraction of conflict.”

It blasted Israeli behavior regarding Palestinians both “within Israel” as well as the OPT, charging Israel with “longstanding discrimination” all the way back to the state’s founding and not just since 1967.

No recognition is made in the report of the disputed nature of the territory, to which Israel has a strong, legal claim according to many international legal scholars.

Neither is any mention made of the tens of thousands of rockets Palestinians have fired indiscriminately into Israel over recent years or the ongoing terrorist attacks, which is the reason for the defensive measures Israel practices to protect its citizens – Arab and Jewish alike.

Kothari went even further than the initial report in condemning Israel, saying, “Apartheid is a useful paradigm/framework to understand the situation but not sufficient.”

“Ending ‘apartheid’ will not end the crisis of occupation for the Palestinian peoples,” he added, lumping Arab citizens of Israel together with the Arabs living in the Palestinian Authority-administered territories.

The Commission would get to the apartheid issue, he promised, as well as “tackle this issue of how far you can take antisemitism.”

‘From the river to the sea’

Twice during the interview, Kothari mentioned investigating the human rights situation “from the river to the sea.” This expression is considered antisemitic as it is used by Israel’s foes to promote the elimination of the Jewish state in its entirety – from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea – rather than the establishment of a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria.

Kothari also used a classic antisemitic trope when he criticized efforts by countries such as the U.S. and Canada to stop the Commission’s work.

“We are very disheartened by the social media that is controlled largely by – whether it’s the Jewish lobby or it’s specific NGOs, a lot of money is being thrown into trying to discredit us,” he said.

Prof. Anne Bayefsky, a prominent Canadian lawyer and human rights expert who heads the Touro College Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust, was not surprised by Kothari’s statements.

He and his fellow Commission members had been appointed “precisely because of their very well-known bias against Israel – which this interview obviously confirms,” she said Tuesday, as reported in conservative American news site CNSNews.

Kothari’s statements, she added, were “a grotesque display of antisemitism.”

“The legitimacy of this UN inquiry is shot,” she said. “It is an ‘inquiry’ supposedly about ‘systematic discrimination’ whose purpose and practice is to engage in systematic discrimination – against the Jewish state and Jews.”

Jerusalem has refused to cooperate in any way with the UN investigation, citing its “discriminatory and biased” nature,and its unprecedented mandate to be permanent and open-ended.

The Commission’s next report is set to be presented to the UN General Assembly in October.

The post Top UN official: Israel should be thrown out of international body appeared first on World Israel News.