The organization referred to terrorist supporter as an “adviser to the Palestinian negotiating team in peace talks with Israel from 1999 to 2001.”

By Americans For A Safe Israel

Should a Jewish organization host a speaker who has served as a representative of the world’s deadliest Palestinian Arab terrorist group and has minimized Hamas’s responsibility for the murder of the Bibas children?

That is the question raised by the participation of former PLO official Omar Dajani in an upcoming webinar hosted by Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI), a U.S. support group for Israel’s leftwing Meretz Party.

The announcement circulated by PPI about the upcoming event misleadingly refers to Dajani merely an “adviser to the Palestinian negotiating team in peace talks with Israel from 1999 to 2001.” But that “Palestinian negotiating team” was in fact part of the PLO, which has been responsible for the many of the world’s most heinous terrorist attacks.

During Dajani’s years of service to the PLO, 1999-2001, the terror group launched and directed the Second Intifada, in which more than one thousand Israelis were murdered in a five-year torrent of thousands of suicide bombings, shooting attacks, and stabbings.

Americans For A Safe Israel (AFSI) has found no evidence that Dajani has ever expressed remorse for his service in the PLO or that he has ever explicitly condemned the PLO’s terrorist attacks, such as the Second Intifada.

In the aftermath of October 7, Dajani’s social media posts invoked the pro-Hamas slogan, “Free Palestine,” and denounced former president Biden as “Genocide Joe.” In recent days, Dajani has posted multiple messages absolving Hamas of responsibility for murdering the Bibas children.

AFSI national chairman Moshe Phillips said: “No Jewish organization should host an unrepentant ex-PLO terrorist official who whitewashes Hamas’s barbaric slaughter of the Bibas children.”

The post Jewish group hosts ex-terrorist who minimized Bibas killings appeared first on World Israel News.

Former MK Avraham Burg, the Jewish partner in the new movement, has served as chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel, Speaker of the Knesset, and Interim President of Israel. 

By Moshe Phillips, JNS

A new political movement in Israel is calling for the creation of a binational Arab-Jewish entity instead of a Jewish state. The movement’s plan includes eliminating the anthem “Hatikvah,” the Israeli flag and the Law of Return. So, why is an American Zionist organization providing a platform to such extremists?

These are frustrating times for the far-left in Israel. Its main voice, the Meretz Party, did not win enough votes in the last election to enter the Knesset. It is unclear whether the party will survive.

One party is hoping to take Meretz’s place on the far-left. Former Knesset Member Avraham Burg and Haifa University professor Faisal Azaiza have created a new party called “All Its Citizens.” In an early June webinar, Burg and Azaiza explained their platform and their goal of attracting those who voted for Meretz and other far-left parties in the last election.

The Burg-Azaiza platform is noticeably more extreme than that of Meretz. In fact, they want to completely strip Israel of its Jewish identity. Burg said that the music to “Hatikvah” would be retained, but the lyrics would be removed. The national flag would not display a Star of David. Instead, it would just be “a color.” The Law of Return—which grants automatic citizenship to any Jew who needs or wants it—would be repealed. Instead, Burg said, “An individual Jew who is persecuted might be given a fast track to citizenship.” He quickly added, “Palestinians seeking shelter would have the same right.”

Burg explicitly denounced the idea of any connection between Israel and world Jewry. “Israel does not belong to the whole Jewish people—it belongs only to the citizens of Israel,” he asserted.

Obviously, Burg and Azaiza have the right to promote their anti-Zionist vision. What is noteworthy, however, is that they did so via a webinar hosted and promoted by an ostensibly Zionist organization—Partners for Progressive Israel (PPI).

PPI is the U.S. equivalent of Meretz. The Burg-Azaiza party, however, is much more extreme than Meretz ever was. Meretz does not reject such basic tenets of Zionism as the idea that Israel belongs to the entire Jewish people. The very first paragraph of its platform calls Israel “the country of the Jewish people” and “the national home for the Jewish people,” as well as a country of its citizens. This is the opposite of what Burg now advocates.

The Meretz platform does not call for eliminating “Hatikvah,” the Israeli flag or the Law of Return. In fact, it contains language that indicates the party expects the Law of Return will never be abolished.

Moreover, the Meretz platform speaks of an Israel-Diaspora relationship that is very different from what Burg demands. On page 29 of its platform, the party states, “There is a historic and national connection between Jews in the State of Israel and Jews in the Diaspora.”

The platform then explicitly embraces the statement from Israel’s Declaration of Independence, “The State of Israel will be open to Jewish immigration and to the ingathering of the exiles.” Meretz emphasizes that it “openly welcomes Jews who are interested in settling here.”

As a former member of the board of the American Zionist Movement, I know that its member organizations take its principles seriously. AZM’s mission statement, as featured on its website, declares that it “is comprised of 42 national Jewish Zionist organizations and works across a broad ideological, political and religious spectrum linking the American Jewish community together in support of Israel, Zionism and the Jewish people.”

AZM has accepted PPI as a member, which means it believed that PPI accepts AZM’s basic principles. But promoting the Burg-Azaiza anti-Zionist party is not “promoting and defending Zionism.” It is doing the exact opposite. Their party clearly opposes the most fundamental principles and symbols of Zionism.

Perhaps PPI will claim that it was merely presenting the Burg-Azaiza webinar for informational purposes, not as an endorsement. Perhaps it will say that PPI’s former executive director, who hosted the webinar, was just being polite when he offered to send links to Burg’s podcasts and other activities to members of the listening audience. Perhaps.

Yet the webinar did not offer any opposing points of view. It didn’t contain critical or challenging questions. It was essentially a free infomercial for the “All Its Citizens” party, including helpful offers of assistance from PPI’s host.

Partners for Progressive Israel owes it to the American Zionist community to clearly reject and denounce the anti-Zionist principles that were presented in its webinar by Burg and Azaiza. If it does not do so, AZM’s other member organizations may justifiably conclude that PPI, while claiming to be Zionist, is in fact promoting anti-Zionism itself.

Moshe Phillips is a commentator on Jewish affairs. He was previously a U.S. delegate to the World Zionist Congress and served as a member of the board of the American Zionist Movement.

The post Why is ostensibly Zionist organization promoting party that opposes Jewish statehood? appeared first on World Israel News.