World News

Defending Syrian regime, Trump envoy criticizes ‘confusing’ Israeli intervention

After Israel carries out airstrikes in Syria to end slaughter of members of Druze minority, American ambassador criticizes Israeli intervention, says it had “very bad” timing.

By World Israel News Staff

A senior American diplomat chided Israel’s intervention last week on behalf of the Druze minority, calling the Israeli strikes in Syria “very confusing” and poorly timed.

Last week, violence erupted in the predominantly Druze province of as-Suwayda in southern Syria after radical Sunni Bedouin militias assaulted and abducted a Druze vendor on a road to Damascus.

When Druze militias retaliated, the Syrian regime deployed armored forces to the region, leading to accusations by local Druze that regime soldiers actively abetted the slaughter of dozens of Druze civilians and captured fighters.

Israel, which has warned Damascus not to deploy forces in the as-Suwayda or Dara’a provinces in southern Syria, responded to the killings with strikes on Syrian forces in As-Suwayda as well as bombings at the entrance to the Syrian defense ministry headquarters.

On Monday, Thomas Barrack, Trump’s ambassador to Turkey who also serves as special envoy to the Syrian regime, criticized Israel’s intervention in Syria, warning in an interview with The Associated Press that the strikes endangered a broader diplomatic push and weakened the new government.

Barrack did condemn the violence in as-Suwayda but appeared to blame both the Bedouin and Druze militias equally, while backing the Syrian government’s response.

Labeling the “killing, the revenge, the massacres on both sides” as “intolerable,” Barrack defended “the current government of Syria,” saying that “in my opinion, [the government] has conducted themselves as best they can as a nascent government with very few resources to address the multiplicity of issues that arise in trying to bring a diverse society together.”

The ambassador claimed Israel did not notify the US prior to its strikes in Syria, distancing the Trump administration from Israel’s intervention.

“The United States was not asked, nor did they participate in that decision, nor was it the United States’ responsibility in matters that Israel feels is for its own self-defense,” he said.

Admonishing Jerusalem, Barrack said Israel’s defense of the Syrian Druze “creates another very confusing chapter” and “came at a very bad time.”

The US brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Syria over the weekend after regime forces began withdrawing from as-Suwayda as part of a separate agreement between Damascus and Druze leaders.

Share
Published by
David Rosenberg
Tags: Druze IDF Syria Syrian Druze Tom Barrack Trump administration

Recent Posts

  • Videos

Netanyahu: Jews and Evangelicals face a common battle

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with Evangelical Christian leaders in Washington on Wednesday, urging them…

17 minutes ago
  • Middle East

Trump mulling two-week military op against Iranian ballistic missiles – report

American military commander in the Mideast is pushing plan for 10-14 day large-scale air campaign…

19 minutes ago
  • Uncategorized

CENTCOM reveals massive force enforcing blockade of Iranian ports

US Central Command (CENTCOM) has revealed the full scale of the American military force enforcing…

35 minutes ago
  • Middle East

Trump tells Netanyahu Saudi normalization remains tied to US nuclear deal – report

Saudi official confirms Riyadh still open to normalization deal with Israel, as President Trump reportedly…

2 hours ago
  • Middle East

US launches new strikes on Iran after Trump vows to hit Tehran ‘very hard’

US forces bomb dozens of targets in Iran hours after President Trump threatened to hit…

3 hours ago
  • World News

US-Saudi strikes in Iraq kill about 20 Iranian ‘advisers’, report says

Saudi Arabia participated alongside the United States in the strikes, which targeted militia positions in…

8 hours ago