World News

Defending Syrian regime, Trump envoy criticizes ‘confusing’ Israeli intervention

After Israel carries out airstrikes in Syria to end slaughter of members of Druze minority, American ambassador criticizes Israeli intervention, says it had “very bad” timing.

By World Israel News Staff

A senior American diplomat chided Israel’s intervention last week on behalf of the Druze minority, calling the Israeli strikes in Syria “very confusing” and poorly timed.

Last week, violence erupted in the predominantly Druze province of as-Suwayda in southern Syria after radical Sunni Bedouin militias assaulted and abducted a Druze vendor on a road to Damascus.

When Druze militias retaliated, the Syrian regime deployed armored forces to the region, leading to accusations by local Druze that regime soldiers actively abetted the slaughter of dozens of Druze civilians and captured fighters.

Israel, which has warned Damascus not to deploy forces in the as-Suwayda or Dara’a provinces in southern Syria, responded to the killings with strikes on Syrian forces in As-Suwayda as well as bombings at the entrance to the Syrian defense ministry headquarters.

On Monday, Thomas Barrack, Trump’s ambassador to Turkey who also serves as special envoy to the Syrian regime, criticized Israel’s intervention in Syria, warning in an interview with The Associated Press that the strikes endangered a broader diplomatic push and weakened the new government.

Barrack did condemn the violence in as-Suwayda but appeared to blame both the Bedouin and Druze militias equally, while backing the Syrian government’s response.

Labeling the “killing, the revenge, the massacres on both sides” as “intolerable,” Barrack defended “the current government of Syria,” saying that “in my opinion, [the government] has conducted themselves as best they can as a nascent government with very few resources to address the multiplicity of issues that arise in trying to bring a diverse society together.”

The ambassador claimed Israel did not notify the US prior to its strikes in Syria, distancing the Trump administration from Israel’s intervention.

“The United States was not asked, nor did they participate in that decision, nor was it the United States’ responsibility in matters that Israel feels is for its own self-defense,” he said.

Admonishing Jerusalem, Barrack said Israel’s defense of the Syrian Druze “creates another very confusing chapter” and “came at a very bad time.”

The US brokered a ceasefire between Israel and Syria over the weekend after regime forces began withdrawing from as-Suwayda as part of a separate agreement between Damascus and Druze leaders.

Share
Published by
David Rosenberg
Tags: Druze IDF Syria Syrian Druze Tom Barrack Trump administration

Recent Posts

  • World News

US judge green lights Trump’s $10b defamation lawsuit against the BBC

Federal judge allows Trump’s multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against BBC to proceed.

2 hours ago
  • Middle East

Iran producing 50 ballistic missiles monthly, has stockpile of 1,700 missiles

Despite conflict with US and Israel, and after months of tightening sanctions, Iran still has…

5 hours ago
  • Middle East

US envoy calls UNIFIL ‘human shield for terrorists’ on Israel-Lebanon border

Ahead of Lebanon visit, US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz rips UN peacekeeping force,…

6 hours ago
  • Israel News

Israel expecting Iran war, despite US diplomatic push

Israeli security officials acknowledge that any renewed conflict could unfold in unexpected ways.

6 hours ago
  • Israel News

Prominent Israeli newscaster resigns, citing left-wing bias

In announcing her resignation, Ayala Hasson accused Kan of failing in its duty to represent…

6 hours ago
  • World News

Two arrested as anti-Israel protesters target Biden in Dublin

Objects were thrown as the Bidens left the venue.

6 hours ago