Analysis & Opinion

How much longer will the entire West be defended by the United States and Israel?

While Iranians were being slaughtered in the streets, officials from the British Foreign Office were celebrating with regime leaders the anniversary of Khomeini’s revolution.

By Giulio Meotti, Middle East Forum

For decades, the so-called “Western experts” had warned us that it was too risky to attack Tehran, that the Iranians had too many missiles, that their armed forces were too large, that their leadership was too cunning, that it was inevitable that Iran would build the atomic bomb and that there was nothing we could do except sign useless treaties that were not worth the paper they were written on.

Jacques Chirac theorized that the Iranian atomic bomb would not be “very dangerous.”

In an essay that caused a sensation, “Why Iran Should Get the Bomb,” published by Foreign Affairs, the famous political scientist Kenneth Waltz theorized that an Iranian bomb would be a “source of stability.”

Defeatism is the worn-out garment of decadent Western ruling classes.

The US-Israel military operations have so far been extraordinarily successful, and two weeks after the start of the conflict, the Islamic regime has been forced to attack ships, threaten to lay mines, bomb oil infrastructure, and unleash economic terrorism in a last attempt to survive.

The leaders of the Islamic Republic, those who are still alive, that is, are underground. The regime has seen thousands of its sites reduced to rubble.

It has suffered catastrophic losses. Its air defenses have been annihilated. Its air force is finished. Its navy lies at the bottom of Hormuz.

What remains is the work of dismantling the Iranian nuclear program and the liberation of Hormuz (regime change is more difficult).

And if we fail, all the revisionist regimes on the face of the earth will draw the appropriate conclusions. And many of our new Arab friends will also think that friendship with the “infidels” was not worth it.

Many, to tell the truth, already seem to have failed.

Many European countries have delighted the enemies of the West, discouraged our friends, and humiliated themselves.

Just a single drone attack, without deaths or injuries, and the Italian contingent will be withdrawn from Iraqi Kurdistan, where we were training the heroic Kurds in the war against ISIS at a base named after the legionary fortress of Septimius Severus.

The “freezing” of the Italian military mission in Erbil is a sensational blow delivered by pro-Iranian militias in Iraq.

Is that all it takes to make us withdraw? Shame on my country.

Germany is also withdrawing its soldiers from Iraq while continuing to purchase weapons from Israel.

Spain is the great soft underbelly of Europe (sorry for the great politician José María Aznar).

Then there is England, which has just decided to remove the face of Winston Churchill from banknotes.

Who will replace him? Shakespeare? No, hedgehogs and badgers.

The glorious United Kingdom perhaps deserves to become the Islamic Kingdom.

A British Labour politician—speaking unofficially—said it bluntly: “Jordanians, Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and even Canadians all ask, ‘What the hell are you doing? Whose side are you on?’”

While Iranians were being slaughtered in the streets, officials from the British Foreign Office were celebrating with regime leaders the anniversary of Khomeini’s revolution.

The key question was posed by former colonel Richard Kemp in the Telegraph: “How much longer will the United States and Israel fight for us?”

First the Houthi terrorists in Yemen attacked one of the most important trade routes in the world, the Red Sea, slowing global supply chains.

And we Europeans yawned.

Now the collective pacifist—who on TV and in newspapers complains about the cost of filling up diesel and gasoline because of “Trump and Netanyahu’s war”—would like to let Tehran control a quarter of the world oil market.

If Europe truly existed today, we would see a maritime coalition under the EU flag helping the United States and Israel free the passage at Hormuz.

Instead, the “collective West” is dead: all that remains are two rock-solid leaders in Jerusalem and Washington. If it weren’t for them, Europe would already be learning the Shahada in Farsi.

Share
Published by
Yossi Licht
Tags: Iran NATO Strait of Hormuz Western nations

Recent Posts

  • Israel News

Israel reclassifies crocodiles, opening door for Ben-Gvir’s prison moat plan

Ben-Gvir's proposal envisions using crocodiles as a living security barrier around prisons such as Ketziot…

17 hours ago
  • World News

US pounds strategic Iranian city as Iran strikes US bases across region

Using fighter jets, drones and warships, US forces struck military logistics hubs, coastal surveillance positions,…

18 hours ago
  • Israel News

Herzog: Peace With Saudi Arabia Remains ‘My Dream,’ Applauds Renewed Strikes on Iran

Herzog praised the Abraham Accords as a model for regional cooperation.

18 hours ago
  • Videos

WATCH: Former envoy Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg calls for Trump admin to do more than airstrikes

Former Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg urged President Trump to heavily target Iran's economy — specifically…

19 hours ago
  • Israel News

Israel’s parliament dissolves ahead of Oct. 27 elections

The last time Israel’s government fulfilled a full term without breaking for early elections was…

20 hours ago
  • Jewish Diaspora & Antisemitism

Jewish advocacy group blasts Australian higher education establishment over antisemitism revelations

The council also criticized universities’ inaction over the encampments and the presence on some campuses…

20 hours ago