Analysis & Opinion

How much longer will the entire West be defended by the United States and Israel?

While Iranians were being slaughtered in the streets, officials from the British Foreign Office were celebrating with regime leaders the anniversary of Khomeini’s revolution.

By Giulio Meotti, Middle East Forum

For decades, the so-called “Western experts” had warned us that it was too risky to attack Tehran, that the Iranians had too many missiles, that their armed forces were too large, that their leadership was too cunning, that it was inevitable that Iran would build the atomic bomb and that there was nothing we could do except sign useless treaties that were not worth the paper they were written on.

Jacques Chirac theorized that the Iranian atomic bomb would not be “very dangerous.”

In an essay that caused a sensation, “Why Iran Should Get the Bomb,” published by Foreign Affairs, the famous political scientist Kenneth Waltz theorized that an Iranian bomb would be a “source of stability.”

Defeatism is the worn-out garment of decadent Western ruling classes.

The US-Israel military operations have so far been extraordinarily successful, and two weeks after the start of the conflict, the Islamic regime has been forced to attack ships, threaten to lay mines, bomb oil infrastructure, and unleash economic terrorism in a last attempt to survive.

The leaders of the Islamic Republic, those who are still alive, that is, are underground. The regime has seen thousands of its sites reduced to rubble.

It has suffered catastrophic losses. Its air defenses have been annihilated. Its air force is finished. Its navy lies at the bottom of Hormuz.

What remains is the work of dismantling the Iranian nuclear program and the liberation of Hormuz (regime change is more difficult).

And if we fail, all the revisionist regimes on the face of the earth will draw the appropriate conclusions. And many of our new Arab friends will also think that friendship with the “infidels” was not worth it.

Many, to tell the truth, already seem to have failed.

Many European countries have delighted the enemies of the West, discouraged our friends, and humiliated themselves.

Just a single drone attack, without deaths or injuries, and the Italian contingent will be withdrawn from Iraqi Kurdistan, where we were training the heroic Kurds in the war against ISIS at a base named after the legionary fortress of Septimius Severus.

The “freezing” of the Italian military mission in Erbil is a sensational blow delivered by pro-Iranian militias in Iraq.

Is that all it takes to make us withdraw? Shame on my country.

Germany is also withdrawing its soldiers from Iraq while continuing to purchase weapons from Israel.

Spain is the great soft underbelly of Europe (sorry for the great politician José María Aznar).

Then there is England, which has just decided to remove the face of Winston Churchill from banknotes.

Who will replace him? Shakespeare? No, hedgehogs and badgers.

The glorious United Kingdom perhaps deserves to become the Islamic Kingdom.

A British Labour politician—speaking unofficially—said it bluntly: “Jordanians, Emiratis, Kuwaitis, and even Canadians all ask, ‘What the hell are you doing? Whose side are you on?’”

While Iranians were being slaughtered in the streets, officials from the British Foreign Office were celebrating with regime leaders the anniversary of Khomeini’s revolution.

The key question was posed by former colonel Richard Kemp in the Telegraph: “How much longer will the United States and Israel fight for us?”

First the Houthi terrorists in Yemen attacked one of the most important trade routes in the world, the Red Sea, slowing global supply chains.

And we Europeans yawned.

Now the collective pacifist—who on TV and in newspapers complains about the cost of filling up diesel and gasoline because of “Trump and Netanyahu’s war”—would like to let Tehran control a quarter of the world oil market.

If Europe truly existed today, we would see a maritime coalition under the EU flag helping the United States and Israel free the passage at Hormuz.

Instead, the “collective West” is dead: all that remains are two rock-solid leaders in Jerusalem and Washington. If it weren’t for them, Europe would already be learning the Shahada in Farsi.

Share
Published by
Yossi Licht
Tags: Iran NATO Strait of Hormuz Western nations

Recent Posts

  • Israel News

Israeli court refuses to freeze controversial E1 project east of Jerusalem

Court rejects petition calling to freeze the issuing of tenders for the E1 project east…

23 minutes ago
  • World News

Trump declined to intervene against UK sanctions on Israel – report

President Trump was informed ahead of time of Britain's plans to impose new sanctions on…

1 hour ago
  • Israel News

The battle for Israel: 38 parties submit lists as Netanyahu faces fight for power

38 parties, one government: Israel’s election battle officially begins. World Israel News Staff Israel’s October…

1 hour ago
  • WhatsApp Brief

Trump knew — and didn’t object: US gave Britain green light to target Israel over Judea and Samaria

President Donald Trump was briefed in advance on Britain’s sweeping measures against Jewish communities in…

2 hours ago
  • WhatsApp Brief

War escalates as Iran attacks Jordan, eight tankers, two US vessels and claims capture of American unmanned submarine

The confrontation between Washington and Tehran escalated sharply overnight, with Iran launching a major ballistic…

2 hours ago
  • Source-WIN

Iran launches major missile attack on US bases in Jordan

The IRGC claimed its naval forces had ambushed a US submarine at the entrance to…

9 hours ago