Jewish Diaspora & Antisemitism

Letter reveals why Oxford English Dictionary’s first editor left out ‘anti-Semite’

The famous British lexicographer didn’t believe the word would last.

By World Israel News Staff

British lexicographer James Murray, the first editor of the Oxford English Dictionary, decided against including the word “anti-Semite” in the first edition of the dictionary in 1879, Agence France-Presse reports.

When Claude Montefiore, a leading member of Britain’s Jewish community, found out that “anti-Semite” and its derivative terms would be left out, he wrote to Murray.

Israel National Library archivist Rachel Misrati recently found Murray’s reply, dated July 5, 1900. (The OED was a work of many years, running from 1884 to 1928.)

Murray’s letter said that anti-Semite had only entered English from German in 1881. Murray said the word wouldn’t last.

“Anti-Semite and its family were then probably very new in English use, and not thought likely to be more than passing nonce-words,” Murray wrote.

“Hence they did not receive treatment in a separate article,” he said, adding that “the man in the street would have said Anti-Jewish.”

“Anti-Semitic has however a flavor of the professor about it, not of the penny-a-liner, & looks like the perpetration of some Viennese pundit,” Murray wrote.

Murray wasn’t far off. The word was coined in in 1879 by German anti-Semite Wilhelm Marr.

Misrati, who found the letter while researching an article on British autographs at the National Library, told AFP that the exchange of letters shows that British Jewry was already worried about anti-Semitism “even though for the Jews in England – compared to many other countries – they were in a very good position.”

“Anti-Semitism in the beginning was against the Semitic races, so he’s placing it in its anti-Jewish context,” she said. “It’s a missing link in the chain of history.”

In 1900, Murray admitted he may have been wrong about his decision to leave the word out. “Would that anti-Semitism had had no more than a fleeting interest!” he wrote.

He told Montefiore that he had hoped the liberal rebellions of 1848 showed Europe “had left ignorance, suspicion and brute force behind us.”

“How the devil must have chuckled at our foolish dreams,” Murray wrote to Montefiore.

“The closing years of the 19th c. have shown, alas! that much of Christianity is only a temporary whitewash over brutal savagery,” he wrote.

“It is unutterably saddening to one like myself who remembers ’48 and the high hopes we had in the fifties.”

“Probably if we had to do that post now, we should have to make Anti-Semite a main word,” Murray wrote.

Share
Published by
David Isaac
Tags: anti-Semitism Discrimination

Recent Posts

  • Israel News

Huckabee questions Board of Peace’s ability to implement Gaza plan

Huckabee warned that replacing military personnel with civilians could create difficulties in direct coordination with…

1 day ago
  • Videos

WATCH: Helmet-cam captures IDF response to Hebron shooting attack that killed two soldiers

Helmet camera footage from a responding officer shows the intense firefight as IDF forces shot…

1 day ago
  • World News

Iranian lawmaker urges authorization of nuclear weapons if US attacks Iran

Jokar also called for Iran to immediately suspend its cooperation and obligations under the Nuclear…

1 day ago
  • Arab-Israeli Conflict

Hebron terrorists planned larger attack targeting Israeli civilians, IDF says

The IDF and Shin Bet are examining whether the pair operated as part of a…

1 day ago
  • Videos

WATCH: Inside the Mossad’s most daring operation ever – Hezbollah’s pagers

In one of the Mossad’s most daring and audacious operations ever, thousands of Hezbollah terrorists…

1 day ago
  • Source-WIN

NBC’s outrageous media bias exposed in twisted coverage of Palestinian terror attack

NBC repeatedly softened its description of Palestinian terrorists while shifting its coverage of a deadly…

1 day ago