The Times reported that the US had privately warned Britain against suspending arms sales, arguing it could hurt efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza.
By Corey Walker, The Algemeiner
US officials are reportedly at odds with their British counterparts over the UK’s decision to suspend some arms export licenses to Israel amid the Jewish state’s ongoing war with the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy announced on Monday that the British government had suspended 30 of 350 arms export licenses with Israel, arguing that the equipment could be used to violate international humanitarian law in Gaza, the Palestinian enclave ruled by Hamas
The move has sparked friction between London and Washington, according to reports, with the latter suggesting that the British may have made reaching an end to the ongoing Israel-Hamas war more difficult.
“They assured us they wouldn’t do this,” an unnamed government source told British broadcaster ITV.
American officials feel “let down” by the UK’s announcement, according to Newsweek.
The US was made aware of Britain’s decision prior to the official Monday announcement, The Daily Telegraph reported.
Meanwhile, a senior British government source told The Times that the US had privately warned Britain against suspending arms sales, arguing it could hurt efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza.
The UK Foreign Office denied these allegations, claiming that the US has not attempted to encourage Britain to reverse its decision.
“Some ministers also criticized the announcement, with one describing it as an attempt to ‘please all sides’ that had ended up ‘pissing everyone off,’” The Times reported.
“Another said the UK should be reviewing arms exports for countries such as Saudi Arabia, warning: ‘Otherwise it just looks like we’re picking out the one Jewish state.’”
US State Department spokesman Matt Miller said on Tuesday that while Washington respects London’s decision to halt weapons shipments to Israel, the US will maintain its commitment to helping the Jewish state defend itself.
“In the same way, we wouldn’t expect the UK to apply a US standard in making their determinations. They have made their determination based on UK law; we will make our determinations based on US law,” Miller told reporters during a press briefing.
Miller denied that the UK’s decision might affect future American arms deals with Israel, saying that the US and Britain are “different countries with different laws, different systems.”
However, Miller noted that the US is currently assessing whether the Jewish state has engaged in violations of international humanitarian law during the Israel-Hamas war.
“We have reviews that are ongoing. I don’t want to prejudge what those reviews will conclude, but we are looking at a number of possible violations of international humanitarian law, and we’ll make our own assessments based on our review of the facts and our own judgments on our laws, as well as international humanitarian law,” Miller said.
The US Department of Defense similarly said during a press briefing on Tuesday that the review is still taking place, but rejected the suggestion that its closest Middle Eastern ally has already been found to have committed any violations.
“Those processes are ongoing. As of now, we have not determined at this point that Israel has violated international humanitarian law, but those assessments, to include those of the State Department looking at allegations, are still ongoing,” Air Force Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder, the Pentagon’s press secretary, told reporters.
Amid backlash, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended the weapons halt against Israel as a “legal decision” and not an overall arms blockade.
“This is a difficult issue, I recognize that, but it’s a legal decision, not a policy decision,” Starmer said.
“We will of course stand by Israel’s right to self-defense but it’s important that we are committed to the international rule of law,” he added.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday condemned Britain’s decision as “shameful” but vowed to continue the war against Hamas “with or without British arms.”
“This shameful decision will not change Israel’s determination to defeat Hamas, a genocidal terrorist organization that savagely murdered 1,200 people on October 7, including 14 British citizens,” Netanyahu said in a social media post.
“Hamas is still holding over 100 hostages, including 5 British citizens. Instead of standing with Israel, a fellow democracy defending itself against barbarism, Britain’s misguided decision will only embolden Hamas.”
He added, “With or without British arms, Israel will win this war and secure our common future.”
Britain’s chief rabbi also criticized the government’s decision to halt several arms export licenses to the Jewish state.
“It beggars belief that the British government, a close strategic ally of Israel, has announced a partial suspension of arms licences,” Ephraim Mirvis said on X/Twitter.
He said the move would bolster unfounded claims that Israel had violated international humanitarian law.
“Sadly, this announcement will serve to encourage our shared enemies,” Mirvis said.
“It will not help to secure the release of the remaining 101 hostages, nor contribute to the peaceful future we wish and pray for, for all people in the region and beyond.”