Source-WIN

Right-wing party rejects US conditions for annexing Judea and Samaria

Right wing party cites American conditions for annexation as one of the reasons it did not join Netanyahu’s national unity government.

By Paul Shindman

The conditions America is imposing on Israel in order for the Trump Administration to recognize the proposed annexation of settlements by Israel are among the reasons the right-wing Yemina party is not joining Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government, Maariv reported Sunday.

In an interview published last week in the Israel Hayom newspaper, U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman strongly hinted that the Trump administration would recognize Israeli annexation of settlements in Judea and Samaria so long as certain conditions were met.

Among the conditions are a freeze on settlement expansion on those towns Israel will not annex and an agreement that the prime minister will negotiate with the Palestinians on the basis of the Trump plan, which includes a future Palestinian state – two policies to which Yemina says it cannot agree.

While other right-wing supporters also did not approve of these the two conditions, it was a risk worth taking because, in their opinion, a future Palestinian state will likely never come out of the Trump plan. The Palestinian Authority in Ramallah rejected the plan outright, and the Hamas terror group that controls Gaza is not interested in any peace plan, let alone the reconciliation with the PA required to form an independent state before the four-year time frame of the Trump plan expires.

“I am receiving lots of comments from our activists and supporters as well as from other parties, which strengthen us in our decision to go to the opposition with our heads up and present a genuine right-wing alternative to the left-wing government that is going to stand here headed by Netanyahu,” Transportation Minister Bezalel Smotrich tweeted. “It is not a shame to serve the people of Israel from the opposition.”

American leaders had hinted they would not oppose Israeli annexation in Judea and Samaria, but Friedman was the first to voice actual conditions that Israel would have to meet to get American recognition of any decision to declare sovereignty over settlements.  That included promises to not expand hosuing, but only build up on existing buildings in any settlements outside those that are annexed.

“In this situation, it is better for Yemina to remain in opposition than for a relatively short time to be faced with the dilemma of supporting something that is against the party’s and the sector’s ideology or to support it up from within the government.”

Share
Published by
Paul Shindman
Tags: Annexation Bezalel Smotrich David Friedman Judea and Samaria Settlements Yamina

Recent Posts

  • Analysis & Opinion

Pollard: The mountain war for the heartland of Israel must be won

The battle for Judea and Samaria will ultimately be decided on the strategic hilltops where…

1 hour ago
  • Middle East

US rules out new talks with Iran on Hormuz – report

The US has the upper hand over Iran in the Strait of Hormuz, leading the…

4 hours ago
  • Videos

WATCH: US postal service worker caught making antisemitic remark

A USPS worker in Hartford, Connecticut, grew frustrated with an overstuffed mailbox and was caught…

5 hours ago
  • Arab-Israeli Conflict

Likud rebukes Kushner, says Doha strike helped force Hamas into hostage deal

Israel's ruling Likud party pushes back on Jared Kushner’s claim that Israel’s attempt to kill…

5 hours ago
  • World News

CAIR honors Ben & Jerry’s co-founder Ben Cohen for anti-Israel advocacy

Last year's Champion of Justice Award went to Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia graduate student detained…

5 hours ago
  • World News

Clinton: US scrapped secret CIA op to kill Osama bin Laden before 9/11

Former President Bill Clinton says he authorized CIA to kill Osama bin Laden before the…

6 hours ago