World News

‘Genocide, ethnic cleansing’ – PA attacks Israel at ICJ hearing

Jerusalem did not send attorneys to present counter arguments to the claim, and the court’s decision is not legally binding for Israel.

By World Israel News Staff

Palestinian Authority Foreign Minister Riyad Al-Maliki slammed Israel during an International Court of Justice (ICJ) hearing on Monday, accusing the Jewish state of “genocide” and “illegal occupation.”

Al-Maliki asked the court to “declare that the Israeli occupation is illegal” and that jurists push Israel to withdraw its control of Jerusalem and Judea and Samaria “immediately, totally and unconditionally.”

He added that Israel is guilty of “ethnic cleansing, apartheid, or genocide” against Palestinians.

Attorney Paul Reichler, representing the PA, argued that Israel’s ultimate goal is usurpation of all Palestinian territories in Judea and Samaria.

“Senior Israeli officials admit their objective is sovereignty over all the territory over the Green Line,” Reichler charged.

“There is no reason not to take them at their word because their deeds are consistent with them.”

Israel “has been steadily annexing Palestinian territory and the objective is the permanent acquisition of this territory and to exercise sovereignty over it, in defiance of the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force,” he added.

Last year, the UN General Assembly asked the ICJ to provide an advisory opinion regarding the legality of Israel’s communities in Judea and Samaria, along with its control of eastern Jerusalem.

Israel maintains that the dispute regarding territorial divisions with the Palestinian Authority is a political matter and therefore does not recognize the ICJ’s jurisdiction in the case.

Jerusalem did not send attorneys to present counter arguments to the claim, and the court’s decision is not legally binding for Israel.

Notably, the ICJ issued a ruling in 2004 demanding that Israel take down the security barrier, which divides pre-1967 Israel from Palestinian towns and cities in Judea and Samaria.

The barrier was constructed during the Second Intifada in order to reduce terrorism.

Israel ignored that ICJ ruling, with little to no real world consequences.

Share
Published by
Lauren Marcus
Tags: anti-Israel bias ICJ Palestinian Authority United Nations

Recent Posts

  • Videos

WATCH: Ted Cruz sounds the alarm on Abdul El-Sayed – ‘He’s Muslim Brotherhood’

Sen. Ted Cruz warned against electing Abdul El-Sayed, claiming Chuck Schumer could seat him on…

36 minutes ago
  • Middle East

Iran refuses to give up enriched uranium, demands US concessions before talks

Tehran rules out transfer of its enriched uranium stockpile to any other country, while also…

50 minutes ago
  • Israel News

Iran military buildup could push Israel to pre-election strike

An Israeli source said military action remains possible if developments require the country to defend…

2 hours ago
  • Jewish Diaspora & Antisemitism

60% of UK Jewish students report antisemitic abuse at school

Fewer than half of students who witnessed antisemitism believed school authorities would act if incidents…

2 hours ago
  • Videos

WATCH: Ben-Gvir confronts prisoner charged with raping female guard

Israel’s National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir confronted Fatah prisoner Mahmoud Atallah, who is charged with…

2 hours ago
  • Middle East

Netanyahu warns Iran may use terrorist groups to disrupt Israeli elections

Iran could use terrorist proxy groups like Hamas and Hezbollah to interfere in Israel's upcoming…

2 hours ago